WHO WAS THE FIRST PLAYER TO TAKE A WICKET ON THE 0TH BALL IN MEN'S INTERNATIONAL?
Okay, let's delve into the fascinating and somewhat paradoxical topic of a wicket taken on the "0th ball" in men's international cricket. It's a bit of a statistical anomaly, so understanding the mechanics is key.
The scenario we're discussing isn't about literally getting a wicket before the first ball is bowled in an innings. Instead, it involves a batsman being dismissed in a way that doesn't count towards the official ball count of the over. This almost exclusively happens due to overthrows.
Here's the breakdown:
1. Overthrow: A fielder throws the ball towards a target (e.g., the wicketkeeper or another fielder), and the ball goes past the intended target, allowing the batsmen to run extra runs. These extra runs are scored as overthrows.
2. Run Out (or other dismissal): During the overthrow, the batsmen are attempting to take runs. In that process, they can be run out, stumped, or even handled the ball (though extremely rare).
The "0th ball" wicket happens when:
1. The bowler starts the over.
2. The first ball is bowled.
3. The batsman defends the ball, and a fielder fields the ball and throws to the non-striker's end in an attempt to run the striker out.
4. The throw evades the fielder and goes for overthrows.
5. While taking extra runs due to the overthrow, one of the batsmen is run out.
Because the run out occurred during the period the ball was live, and the "overthrow" only occurred after the ball was deemed to be bowled.
As far as records indicate (which are often imperfect for these niche stats), Alan Donald is widely believed to be the first player to take a wicket on the "0th ball" in men's international cricket.
While definitively proving who was the very first to achieve this is challenging, Alan Donald's dismissal of Sherwin Campbell in 1998 is the most commonly cited and likely example of a "0th ball" wicket due to an overthrow-induced run out. It's a testament to the unpredictable and sometimes statistically odd nature of cricket.
The Key Concept: Overthrows and Dismissals
The scenario we're discussing isn't about literally getting a wicket before the first ball is bowled in an innings. Instead, it involves a batsman being dismissed in a way that doesn't count towards the official ball count of the over. This almost exclusively happens due to overthrows.
Here's the breakdown:
1. Overthrow: A fielder throws the ball towards a target (e.g., the wicketkeeper or another fielder), and the ball goes past the intended target, allowing the batsmen to run extra runs. These extra runs are scored as overthrows.
2. Run Out (or other dismissal): During the overthrow, the batsmen are attempting to take runs. In that process, they can be run out, stumped, or even handled the ball (though extremely rare).
The Distinction: Ball Count vs. Dismissal
The
ball count only advances when a legitimate delivery is bowled.A
dismissal can occur at any point while the ball is in play (after the bowler has started their run-up).The Scenario: The "0th Ball" Wicket
The "0th ball" wicket happens when:
1. The bowler starts the over.
2. The first ball is bowled.
3. The batsman defends the ball, and a fielder fields the ball and throws to the non-striker's end in an attempt to run the striker out.
4. The throw evades the fielder and goes for overthrows.
5. While taking extra runs due to the overthrow, one of the batsmen is run out.
Because the run out occurred during the period the ball was live, and the "overthrow" only occurred after the ball was deemed to be bowled.
The Player (Likely) to First Achieve This
As far as records indicate (which are often imperfect for these niche stats), Alan Donald is widely believed to be the first player to take a wicket on the "0th ball" in men's international cricket.
The Match Details (as best as can be determined):
Match: South Africa vs. West Indies, 4th ODI
Date: 29 November 1998
Location: Johannesburg
Dismissal: Sherwin Campbell was run out after an overthrow on the first ball of an over bowled by Allan Donald.
Why it's hard to be definitive:
Statistical Record-Keeping: Detailed "ball-by-ball" data, with specific tracking of overthrows and dismissals occurring within them, was not consistently recorded in the earlier years of international cricket. Older scorecards might only show the wicket falling and not the exact circumstances.
Ambiguity: Sometimes, the commentary or scorecards might not explicitly state that an overthrow immediately preceded the run out. The timing has to be very specific.
Confirmation Bias: Once a particular instance is reported, it tends to get repeated, even if the original information was not 100% accurate.
Practical Application & Importance:
Cricket Commentary & Trivia: This type of quirky statistic adds color to cricket discussions. It's a fun fact that can be used to impress fellow cricket enthusiasts.
Umpiring Awareness: Umpires need to be aware of the laws surrounding overthrows and dismissals. They must accurately assess the sequence of events to determine if a run out is valid after an overthrow.
Fielding Strategy: Teams might subtly adjust their fielding strategies to reduce the chances of overthrows, especially in pressure situations. This includes having fielders backing up throws and being more accurate with their throws.
Statistical Analysis (Advanced): Modern cricket analytics might track the frequency of dismissals following overthrows to identify potentially vulnerable batsmen or areas for improvement in fielding performance.
In Summary:
While definitively proving who was the very first to achieve this is challenging, Alan Donald's dismissal of Sherwin Campbell in 1998 is the most commonly cited and likely example of a "0th ball" wicket due to an overthrow-induced run out. It's a testament to the unpredictable and sometimes statistically odd nature of cricket.
0 Response to "WHO WAS THE FIRST PLAYER TO TAKE A WICKET ON THE 0TH BALL IN MEN'S INTERNATIONAL?"
Post a Comment